Preface of "Simple Questions for the Independent Artist: A Handbook"



The recent death of Steve Jobs—visionary icon of the fetishization of rebellion that testifies to the porousness of the distinction between hegemony and counterculture, if not the latter’s complicity with the former—is as momentous a time as any to re-examine a subject position inhabited by numerous cultural workers of varying degrees of expertise that over the years has been growing more and more visible: that of the Independent Artist. The surprising number of festivals, platforms, grants, and residencies that have been sprouting all over the world that cater to the work of independent artists—in short, the amount of institutional support independent artists have been receiving of late, whether tokenist or sustainable—be it in the visual arts, music, film, theater, but especially dance, renders the task relevant not only to artists themselves and the cultural technocrats artists engage with but also to taxpayers and consumers who indirectly finance the support independent artists have been receiving and sustain an emergent economy that positions a particular mode of production within relations of cultural exchange and capital-accumulation. Simple Questions for the Independent Artist: A Handbook is one attempt at such a re-examination. The outcome of discussions between Filipino choreographer-curator Donna Miranda, Filipino poet-critic Angelo V. Suarez, and Australian dance artists Nikki Heywood, Matthew Day, Sam Chester, Alexandra Harrison, and Dean Walsh within the span of a 3-week residency—curated/provoked by Julie-Anne Long and implemented by Emma Saunders—at Campbelltown Arts Centre in Australia, the booklet is meant not so much to disprove the existence of this subject position but to investigate the conditions that allow such an aporetic construct to come into being. The investigation, however, is by no means complete, and the lack of a conclusion—consciously kept out of reach—is foregrounded in the deployment of interrogatives rather than declaratives, each question appearing simple enough to be answerable by yes or no without losing the density of critique.

The writing—let alone the printing—of Simple Questions for the Independent Artist: A Handbook would not have been possible without the support of Campbelltown Arts Centre, directed by Michael Dagostino, and its dance program, curated by Emma Saunders. Our gratitude goes to Julie-Anne Long as well, Ms. Saunders’ predecessor as curator of the dance program, for inviting Donna Miranda for participation in a residency platform whose focus is “to challenge and explore existing thinking and practices around the context of working as an independent artist, both inside and outside ‘institutions’” and for providing the impetus to critically reconsider the relationship between independent artists and institutions. That this handbook is a product of such a relationship needs to be underscored. We also wish to acknowledge the assistance extended by the Australian Embassy in Manila.

MORNING TEA @ 25 October





MORNING TEA
A presentation of morning tea as a platform for presentations & for morning tea. 

Donna Miranda & Angelo V. Suarez 

25 October 2011 11 -11:30am 
Performance Studio, Campbelltown Arts Centre

How we arrived at this

How we arrived at this aphorism is pretty much obvious insofar as the grammar of producing in our time has prescribed. Still it remains unarticulated. Perhaps because autonomy and its ideological identification with the refusal to work -- it, being the dynamics of interdependency involved in independent practice; it, being the material conditions we often talk about if only to refer to its lack, and it, being the self-identification label most of us (independent) practitioners wear with pride -- often blur itself with misplaced notions of emancipation instead of self-sufficiency.

Or perhaps we are often more caught up in the routinely habit of switching roles, fitting hats and juggling time than mapping the coordinates of a terrain that is the independent practice, or terrain of our independence, or simply just of independence from 'x' because there's simply no time. And even in those platforms where practitioners meet as artist-slash-managers to discuss and share stories of their hand-to-mouth existence rarely have those administrative roles and tasks, including the constant movement between those two zones, been remotely considered for work -- both in the sense of proper work as in paid labor, or even work as in proper work in/of art.

That this residency looks at the movement of independent practitioners between institutions and the independent -- "to challenge and explore the existing thinking and practices around the context of working as an independent artist both inside and outside 'institutions'" -- that it is only but fitting to point out the variations of unaccounted labor involved in producing a work and make a work out of it. Be that in the means of doing work, creating work, presenting work, talking about work, planning work, planning periods of work, talking about work, organizing work, working on work, and distributing work. And whether it is the administration of these seemingly menial endeavors that may be considered choreographic insofar as it involves a rhythmic arrangement and coordination of bodies, people, space, time, resources and protocol or the choreographer who mimics an administrator's meticulous proficiency in conducting bodies, people, space, time, resources and protocol is not as consequential as underlining that in the aesthetic regime of artistic production, the "identification of art no longer occurs via a division within ways of doing and making but based on distinguishing a sensible mode of being specific to artistic products (Ranciere, 2009)."

And so it has been agreed...



Following a predetermined schedule of each one's comings and goings, we shall pursue to generate discourse around choreography and administration, looking at institutions including the institution of our own bodies as constituted in the institution of dominant and marginal dance practices at large. The result, not excluding the future posts in this blog, shall be a booklet of aphorism on the network of interdependency sustaining independent practices.